Notices
Tahoe & Suburban The power, space, and brutal towing ability make the Tahoe and its longer sibling, the Suburban, arguably the best full size SUV's on the market today.

2013 Chevrolet Suburban
Platform: GMT 400, 800, 900

Thinking of buying a 2012 suburban LS - any warnings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 29th, 2015, 8:12 PM
  #1  
CF Beginner
Thread Starter
 
M22cm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Thinking of buying a 2012 suburban LS - any warnings?

How are the 2012 suburbans ? I have an 07 Suburban and it has been the worst vehicle I ever owned. Burned oil and had other issues. I'm thinking of buying a 2012 with 53000 miles on it. Cloth interior. Any major issues with these? Thanks in advance for the help. Chris
Old June 29th, 2015, 9:22 PM
  #2  
CF Pro Member
 
intheburbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SE MI
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

If it's a half ton with the 5.3, my opinion is that it's a crapshoot. Notice the two GMT900 trucks in my sig that DON'T have the 5.3.....
Old June 29th, 2015, 10:49 PM
  #3  
CF Senior Member
 
KChevy75's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 361
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

The only difference between the two years would be that any major issues found with the 2007 through 2011 would hopefully have been corrected. Both are the same platform still.

The burning oil issue should be mostly rectified by 2012.

The iron block is not supposed to exhibit the oil consumption issue. It has something to do with engine speed before the afm valve opens. The aluminum block is the one with all the oil consumption issues.

We love our 2007 even though it has had more minor issues than all of the other cars I've ever owned over the last 25 years.

I'm at 204,000 miles now. I did have to rebuild the trans at 202,000 miles due to a broken forward sprag caused by a bad pressure switch manifold.
Old June 30th, 2015, 7:05 AM
  #4  
CF Addict
 
SabrToothSqrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default LS

Didn't the LS have a 4.8 at some point?

I thought the LT was much more common.
Old July 2nd, 2015, 12:31 PM
  #5  
CF Beginner
 
Chester the tahoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SabrToothSqrl
Didn't the LS have a 4.8 at some point?

I thought the LT was much more common.
It was an option my 2007 LS has the 5.3l v8 In it...by the way in m town the LS is way more common than LTZ OR LT. I have been thinking about trading mines in for a 2015 LTZ they have one at the dealer where I purchased my truck from.
Old July 2nd, 2015, 4:11 PM
  #6  
CF Pro Member
 
intheburbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SE MI
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

No Suburban ever had the 4.8 (at least the GMT800/900 trucks, not sure about the 400s).

All half-ton Burbs get the 5.3. The 4.8 is Tahoe only.

I think AFM sucks. I will never own an AFM truck. My '01 5.3 is one of the best engines GM ever built. Why they had to screw it up in '07 with AFM, I'll never know. Oh, wait, I do know....government CAFE regs.....
Old July 2nd, 2015, 4:24 PM
  #7  
CF Beginner
 
Chester the tahoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by intheburbs
No Suburban ever had the 4.8 (at least the GMT800/900 trucks, not sure about the 400s).

All half-ton Burbs get the 5.3. The 4.8 is Tahoe only.

I think AFM sucks. I will never own an AFM truck. My '01 5.3 is one of the best engines GM ever built. Why they had to screw it up in '07 with AFM, I'll never know. Oh, wait, I do know....government CAFE Kimiregs.....
I think the LS suburban had the option to get a 4.8l and at 1 point there was a 6.0l.
Old July 2nd, 2015, 4:40 PM
  #8  
CF Pro Member
 
intheburbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SE MI
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chester the tahoe
I think the LS suburban had the option to get a 4.8l and at 1 point there was a 6.0l.
No, there wasn't. From 2000-2016, no Suburban ever had an available 4.8. Period.

The 6.0 (and 8.1 from 2000-2006) were available in the 3/4-ton trucks.

Which is why I said all HALF-TON Suburbans got the 5.3.

ETA: To the nitpickers - yes, the half ton Yukon XL Denalis get the 6.0 (00-06) or 6.2 (07+).

Last edited by intheburbs; July 2nd, 2015 at 4:49 PM.
Old July 2nd, 2015, 4:49 PM
  #9  
CF Beginner
 
Chester the tahoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by intheburbs
No, there wasn't. From 2000-2016, no Suburban ever had an available 4.8. Period.

The 6.0 (and 8.1 from 2000-2006) were available in the 3/4-ton trucks.

Which is why I said all HALF-TON Suburbans got the 5.3.
Let me rephrase that the Tahoe and suburban did offer a 6.2l v8 on 2 wheel drive models and they started that in 2008 models and above 380 hp and 417 lb-ft
Old July 6th, 2015, 7:57 AM
  #10  
CF Addict
 
SabrToothSqrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Tahoe

The Tahoe LS had a 4.8 at one point, the Suburban never did I think is the clarification.

Also, in 09 My Tahoe had a 6.2L $1,000 option. I didn't take it. Maybe I should have... lol.

My wife drives it now, and no, she doesn't need a 6.2L.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
freight shaker
Other
6
January 24th, 2008 6:26 PM
bfab3
Tahoe & Suburban
13
March 20th, 2007 11:17 PM
Ix Elit3 xI
S-10 & Blazer
0
February 7th, 2007 6:44 PM
freight shaker
Silverado & Fullsize Pick-ups
11
October 9th, 2006 8:19 PM
HACKGT350
K5 Blazer
5
September 28th, 2006 3:30 PM



Quick Reply: Thinking of buying a 2012 suburban LS - any warnings?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.