2014 2500 van engines
#1
CF Beginner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ma
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2014 2500 van engines
we are looking getting a new 2014 3/4 ton express . how are the 4.8 vs the 6.0? any problems about one or the other fuel millage , power ? we would of like to have gotten a small v8 can any advise on how these engines are. . thank you .
#2
CF Senior Member
I just got a 2013 with a 6.0 Plenty of power but the computer just over regulates it. Fuel mileage is better than my old 5.7
I guess it all depends on how much weight you will be carrying.
I guess it all depends on how much weight you will be carrying.
#3
CF Beginner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ma
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the mileage is better than the 5.7 that is good we have the 5.7 now and only get if we are lucky 10 mpg . what are you getting with the 6.0 ? we will be hauling flooring materials and towing a 24 ft car trailer.
#4
CF Senior Member
I haven't checked the exact mileage yet, but it has to be in the mid teens.
Sounds heavy, definetly do your homework on payload and trailering. Its not so much the engine but rather braking and suspension. Might want to consider a one ton van, unless your numbers show to be within payload. You can get the smaller v8 with the 3500 too.
I like the 6.0, but the delay in the throttle and torque management really sucks. Do some test driving...
Sounds heavy, definetly do your homework on payload and trailering. Its not so much the engine but rather braking and suspension. Might want to consider a one ton van, unless your numbers show to be within payload. You can get the smaller v8 with the 3500 too.
I like the 6.0, but the delay in the throttle and torque management really sucks. Do some test driving...
#5
My 95 2500 with the 5.7 got 13 mpg city/hwy, my 2002 2500 with the 5.7 gets 13 mpg city /15 hwy.....
The only thing bad I can say about the new engines is they are very expensive to fix, and there are not thousands out there to pick up at a wrecker if you need one.
If you include that in your calculations, the 5.7 is way cheaper to own in the long run....
The only thing bad I can say about the new engines is they are very expensive to fix, and there are not thousands out there to pick up at a wrecker if you need one.
If you include that in your calculations, the 5.7 is way cheaper to own in the long run....
#6
my '06 with the 6.0l averages about 13-14 which is good for that van from what I hear. But I only have the 3.73 gears. So mine is not really geared towards heaving hauling, more so for daily driving. If you get one with the tow package setup for hauling, I would guess you would be in the 10 range.
The 4.8 would probably be in the mid teens, but won't be as good pulling and towing. So it is definitely a tradeoff. I love my 6.0l though.
Brew
The 4.8 would probably be in the mid teens, but won't be as good pulling and towing. So it is definitely a tradeoff. I love my 6.0l though.
Brew
Trending Topics
#8
my '06 with the 6.0l averages about 13-14 which is good for that van from what I hear. But I only have the 3.73 gears. So mine is not really geared towards heaving hauling, more so for daily driving. If you get one with the tow package setup for hauling, I would guess you would be in the 10 range.
The 4.8 would probably be in the mid teens, but won't be as good pulling and towing. So it is definitely a tradeoff. I love my 6.0l though.
Brew
The 4.8 would probably be in the mid teens, but won't be as good pulling and towing. So it is definitely a tradeoff. I love my 6.0l though.
Brew
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chevrolet Forum News
News, Concepts, SEMA
4
December 16th, 2012 6:36 AM
BiGbAllsMaGEEHeaVyCheVY
Silverado, Sierra & Fullsize Pick-ups
2
August 28th, 2011 2:07 PM
cosrush
General Tech
4
December 5th, 2006 1:43 PM