Notices
1988 - 1998 (GMT400) Section for all discussion related to the 1987-1998 Chevrolet and GMC trucks.

Static Boost Control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old March 11th, 2024, 9:25 AM
  #1  
CF Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
FifthWheelPuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Static Boost Control

There are various boost control mechanism which control the turbo's boost pressure by opening the by-pass port. I have the static type where there is no manual control over it. In other words, it is a sealed canister with a given spring and cannot be adjusted.

Is it better to have another style or not?

Mine engine is the '93 6.5l turbo diesel with automatic trans on the C3500 big trailer hauler.
Old March 12th, 2024, 9:49 AM
  #2  
CF Veteran
 
Gumby22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 1,467
Received 286 Likes on 248 Posts
Default

It shouldn’t be a “static” control if everything is factory. The wastegate actuator does have a spring inside it to keep the wastegate closed, but it’s controlled by the ECM using vacuum via a solenoid.

If there’s no vacuum line on the actuator, it’s either missing/fallen off or the actuator has been removed/replaced by a PO.

The wastegate is opened/closed to maintain ideal boost pressure at all engine speeds/loads. Incorrect boost pressure can not only result in poor performance but could also cause catastrophic engine damage.

If it’s not broke, don’t fix it.

Or…. break it for the sake of fixing it, just make sure to use components that meet OEM specifications when you do.
Old March 15th, 2024, 4:30 PM
  #3  
CF Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
FifthWheelPuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I am pretty positive that the old couple who had the truck new before me never did any change to the turbo system. The whole thing looks stock to me. It has no vacuum lines to the canister. Therefore it is a static unit with only an internal spring. 1993
Old March 15th, 2024, 8:50 PM
  #4  
CF Veteran
 
Gumby22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 1,467
Received 286 Likes on 248 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FifthWheelPuller
I am pretty positive that the old couple who had the truck new before me never did any change to the turbo system. The whole thing looks stock to me. It has no vacuum lines to the canister. Therefore it is a static unit with only an internal spring. 1993
So I’m still trying to confirm this, but it appears GM changed to a static actuator for 1993 models only, but as to exactly why, I don’t know yet.

It’s not really of consequence to my original answer, however - keep it stock.
Old March 16th, 2024, 9:00 PM
  #5  
CF Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
FifthWheelPuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If they are basically the same engine in all those years, then why the difference in the first place? Were they just trying something else to see what happens?

We have seen clear evidence from many experts and users that tweaking things in small ways here and there can accumulate to increased performance, and to longevity as well. I would be inclined to look into some improvements over stock. The thing is currently a fuel hog.
Old March 17th, 2024, 9:09 AM
  #6  
CF Veteran
 
Gumby22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 1,467
Received 286 Likes on 248 Posts
Default

If they are basically the same engine in all those years, then why the difference in the first place? Were they just trying something else to see what happens?
Again, I haven’t been able to confirm it yet. Haven’t had the time. If you can use a search engine, you can find just as much information about it as I have up to this point.

I’m not an expert on the 1993 models; however I am quite familiar with trucks of this era and most of them used similar controls. Vacuum-actuated waste gates were used across all makes which is why I thought it should have one.

We have seen clear evidence from many experts and users that tweaking things in small ways here and there can accumulate to increased performance, and to longevity as well. I would be inclined to look into some improvements over stock.
Not the point I was making. My opinion is to leave it stock for the simple reason that modification/tweaking/etc tends to have unintended consequences.

It’s your choice and if you want to pursue it, good luck.

The thing is currently a fuel hog.
That’s because it’s a diesel being used to pull a 5th wheel. Even modern diesel engines are barely getting 10 MPG while towing.
Old March 17th, 2024, 11:00 AM
  #7  
CF Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
FifthWheelPuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

No, I think you are correct. I would only make changes if others have proven them. And even then, I tend to think like you in regards to not straying far from stock.

My first comment portion was only rhetorical. It is always hard to understand the automotive industry.

BTW, I don't think I'm getting more than 7mpg without the trailer. But the original owners said 7 with the trailer. Obviously, tuning is not uncalled for at this stage, along with some further diagnostics.

Do you mind telling us where you found reference to 1993 having a static unit? I'd like to read that.

Thanks mucho.
Old March 17th, 2024, 3:35 PM
  #8  
CF Veteran
 
Gumby22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 1,467
Received 286 Likes on 248 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FifthWheelPuller
Do you mind telling us where you found reference to 1993 having a static unit? I'd like to read that.

Thanks mucho.
So far I’ve seen it mentioned on 3 diesel-specific forums as I’ve been doing general research; but it’s only been mentioned, not explained.

One thing I’ve found is that 1992-1993 was when the 6.5 was introduced. It’s the first turbocharged diesel GM used (the 6.2 was naturally aspirated).

IME it’s not uncommon for a first generation product to have slightly different controls which are then modified or deleted in subsequent generations as they work to resolve problems, so that’s my best guess in this case at this point.

Here’s the Wikipedia page for GM diesel’s - it doesn’t explain the actuator but it’s the most info I’ve been able to find so far - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detr...esel_V8_engine
Old March 18th, 2024, 8:12 AM
  #9  
CF Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
FifthWheelPuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As always, thanks, Gumby.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bwatt
TrailBlazer
0
February 6th, 2017 1:47 PM
Aaron Padilla Sandoval
Express, Savana & G-Series Vans
0
August 8th, 2016 3:35 PM
santa6
Malibu
1
March 13th, 2012 8:28 PM
twarner776
Silverado, Sierra & Fullsize Pick-ups
1
February 10th, 2009 3:24 PM
gotmyhoe
Tahoe & Suburban
3
January 7th, 2007 5:48 PM



Quick Reply: Static Boost Control



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:51 PM.