Express, Savana & G-Series Vans Offered in both a full size van, or a large box truck, the Express is the modern GM workhorse.

Chevrolet Express
Platform: GMT Van

Savana and Express getting the 2.8L Duramax in 2017

Old Apr 8, 2016 | 9:21 PM
  #1  
dberladyn's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Pro Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 898
Likes: 11
From: West Coast
Default Savana and Express getting the 2.8L Duramax in 2017

As the title states.

http://gmauthority.com/blog/2016/03/2017-gmc-savana-and-chevy-express-gain-2-8-liter-duramax-diesel-option/
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2016 | 11:53 AM
  #2  
canucklehead's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 7
Default

This is if true, really good news.
Seeing GM invest in these vans and continue to resist the retarded Euro van movement is great. These vans are tough, full frame, full width trucks. The new vans like the transit and sprinter are way more $$$ and I hate the interior. Its like spending 70 grand for an airport shuttle bus.
For those of us who don't by cargo vans, but instead get a nice passenger van, and use it for work as well as family trips, the Express Savana are the Only choice.
Gm's biggest mistake was not continuing the AWD option on the 3/4 ton chassis. Maybe the new 6 speed tranny wasn't compatible, but the AWD was a niche they owned.
I just bought a 2013 savana passenger SLE AWD and by the time its worn out, I hope that GM still makes these vans so I will be able to grab a newer used one again.......as for the AWD....I guess I'll see about that then.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2016 | 6:23 PM
  #3  
dberladyn's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Pro Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 898
Likes: 11
From: West Coast
Default

I agree with you. That's the only option I wish I had, AWD. Mond you I'd lose my 6.0, 6 speed and one ton rating, but.. I don't know, everytime I see an AWD I wish I had it.

If these 2.8L diesels were around I would have been interested in one last year, now however... I'm not sure it'll be powerful enough. I think I read they are dropping the 6.6L diesel which I think it a mistake.

Perhaps what GM is really doing is testing a drivetrain for new upcoming model. Build the 2.8L / 8 speed for a few years, see how it performs, sells... then modify the new chassis to accomidate.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2016 | 2:23 AM
  #4  
canucklehead's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 7
Default

I'm all for a new smaller diesel. The 6.6 are crappy on gas now since they had to win the who's got more torque war....
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2016 | 6:41 PM
  #5  
greenfire's Avatar
CF Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 313
Likes: 2
From: Greenwood Lake NY
Default

Hey, this was my idea! I called it! On some thread a month or so back I said put Canyon diesel in the van. I think getting rid of the big Duramax is a mistake too. What about the big 4500 box trucks and buses, etc?
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:16 PM.