Notices
Silverado, Sierra & Fullsize Pick-ups The Silverado & Sierra have been two of the best selling trucks in the US for decades, and is truly proven to be "like a rock".

2014 Chevy Silverado
Platform: Truck, GMT 400, 800, & 900

Diff ratios? whats the pros-cons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 12th, 2009, 8:08 PM
  #1  
CF Beginner
Thread Starter
 
92Stepside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Diff ratios? whats the pros-cons

I took a look at my diff ratio today while doing my brakes, and found that i have 3.73 gears. Could this be the cause of my poor mileage? id like to get some better top speed and better all round mpg.

Do i go up numerically? or down? is 4.54 better? or worse for fuel economy? what is an all around good ratio? for 90-100km/h highway driving, and 50km/h city driving. mostly city driving.

Mark
Old June 12th, 2009, 8:22 PM
  #2  
CF Junior Member
 
BassinProf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm no mechanic but the way I understand it the higher the gear ratio the more engine revolutions per every drive shaft revolution. So... if you want good mileage you want a low ratio, but that will give you less power. My truck came with 4.11 gears which meant tons of low end torque but crummy highway mileage. I believe 3.7 gears are already a pretty good compromise between mileage and power. If you want better mileage you should go down, not up, but that will cost you low end power.
Old June 13th, 2009, 12:04 AM
  #3  
CF Active Member
 
racerx55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3.73 is a good all around gear.
my truck has 3.42 and its a little of a dog towing.
if you had 4.10 or 4.56 youd get bad mileage, 3.73 shouldnt be all that bad, but wont be the best. if you were to change them, the money it costs would not pay for itself for quite a while i dont think.
a taller gear like my 3.42 is worse in town light to light driving.
with the 30" tires on the highway in overdrive it almost struggles to keep itself rolling at 65mph.
1800 rpm is a good highway cruise RPM for most V8 engines to get decent mileage, depending on the cam thats in it.

Last edited by racerx55; June 13th, 2009 at 12:08 AM.
Old June 13th, 2009, 12:34 AM
  #4  
CF Active Member
 
98white5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: East Texas
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3.73 is a perfect balance. 3.42 is the lowest I would go if I were you. When I had my dually, it had 4.56 gears and was a hoss off the line but that five speed still couldn't get it over 114 (speeds by radar) but got 8 mpg. When that truck had a four speed transmission it was even worse, topped at 107 and 6 mpg. I know of a guy around town who has a 2.73 in his late 70's camaro. It's a dog off the line but after 120 it keeps pulling (slowly still) so there is a "too much" and a "not enough"
Old June 13th, 2009, 6:41 PM
  #5  
Super Moderator
 
therewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,474
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

1Gary, racerx55, and 98white5.0 are all right, IMO. 373s are a great all-around gear ratio.

In the event you want better mileage, and you can live with giving up low end power, 342s will give you better MPG and much quieter RPMs at highway speeds. If you travel a lot, or drive a lot on the highway, I recommend them wholeheartedly.

That said, a conversion costs about 2,000$ out the door. If I didn't travel so much, I'd have been thrilled to stick with the brawny 410s the truck originally came with.

The later model Silverados have two issues at the time of conversion. You must reprogram your PCM (thru your OBD II plug) or your speedometer will be inaccurate, and your ABS sensor will trip at highway speed. See if you can get the shop where you're having the work done to do this for you.
Old June 13th, 2009, 8:41 PM
  #6  
Classifieds Moderator
TruckForums Liaison
 
92chevysilvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have 3:73's, a 350, hills, and a heavy foot and I get about 15.5 MPG
Old June 14th, 2009, 1:36 AM
  #7  
Super Moderator
 
suzuki-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It all depends on tire size. I have 4:56 but I have 35 inch tires.
Old June 14th, 2009, 6:00 AM
  #8  
Super Moderator
Ride of the Month
May 2009
 
mudmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Westminster, Md.
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would agree with the majority here and stick with the 3.73 unless you have put on taller tires, it's not cheap to do and will take a long time to repay in fuel savings.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jimstrailblazer
TrailBlazer
0
March 23rd, 2014 9:44 AM
jay-santos
Impala
2
September 9th, 2012 12:04 PM
Edwardsd1
General Tech
4
May 21st, 2012 11:25 AM



Quick Reply: Diff ratios? whats the pros-cons



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:02 AM.