The folding 2nd row seats on my 2011 Tahoe
#1
The folding 2nd row seats on my 2011 Tahoe
As a one-time owner of a 1997 Tahoe and a 2001 Tahoe, I wanted to rant about the folding second row of seats on my 2011 Tahoe. In my opinion, GM/Chevy got it so right with those older trucks - that is, if you needed to fold the second row of seats down for the extra carrying capacity, those model years had a second row of seats that almost disappeared.
On the older models the bottom seat bench folded up towards the front seats and the second row seatbacks folded down to become part of the cargo bed. Total distance in the cargo bed lost to the folded seats: About four inches, which maximized the open cargo area.
On my 2011 truck then second row is now one unit, so that folding them out of the way results in about twelve inches lost in the rear cargo area. Furthermore, the bed is now not one flat and contiguous space - rather, the bed drops off where the second row once was.
I am curious why GM/Chevy changed the operation of the folding second seats. Is there an advantage here that I am not seeing or was it simply a cost cutting move?
On the older models the bottom seat bench folded up towards the front seats and the second row seatbacks folded down to become part of the cargo bed. Total distance in the cargo bed lost to the folded seats: About four inches, which maximized the open cargo area.
On my 2011 truck then second row is now one unit, so that folding them out of the way results in about twelve inches lost in the rear cargo area. Furthermore, the bed is now not one flat and contiguous space - rather, the bed drops off where the second row once was.
I am curious why GM/Chevy changed the operation of the folding second seats. Is there an advantage here that I am not seeing or was it simply a cost cutting move?
#2
I had a 02 Yukon and now an 11 Tahoe LTZ. I would agree with you that the way the seat bottom folded forward and the seat back folded almost flat was better. I think they changed it for several reasons. The lower floor height makes it easier to get in the back when using the 3rd row seats if equiped. The power fold option on the LTZ (maybe other models too) would be harder to implement with the old style and the standard captains chairs on the LTZ would leave a gap in the middle anyway. The lower floor between the captains chairs also makes it easier to get to the 3rd row without folding the seats. I ordered my LTZ with the bench second row and removed the 3rd row seats and put them in the attic so I too wish it worked the old way.
#4
2nd row captains for bench
I have an 08 tahoe with black leather, no power fold, no heat 2nd row captain chairs. I would like to trade for a bench. I live near memphis, tn. and travel near indianapolis often enough. anyone interested?
#7
Trending Topics
#8
We never use the third row seats.
I took one of them out and put it in a plastic bag.
A lot of times we still need more room for groceries.
The second row folds by power, to bad they don't open the same way.
Lee
I took one of them out and put it in a plastic bag.
A lot of times we still need more room for groceries.
The second row folds by power, to bad they don't open the same way.
Lee
#9
As a one-time owner of a 1997 Tahoe and a 2001 Tahoe, I wanted to rant about the folding second row of seats on my 2011 Tahoe. In my opinion, GM/Chevy got it so right with those older trucks - that is, if you needed to fold the second row of seats down for the extra carrying capacity, those model years had a second row of seats that almost disappeared.
On the older models the bottom seat bench folded up towards the front seats and the second row seatbacks folded down to become part of the cargo bed. Total distance in the cargo bed lost to the folded seats: About four inches, which maximized the open cargo area.
On my 2011 truck then second row is now one unit, so that folding them out of the way results in about twelve inches lost in the rear cargo area. Furthermore, the bed is now not one flat and contiguous space - rather, the bed drops off where the second row once was.
I am curious why GM/Chevy changed the operation of the folding second seats. Is there an advantage here that I am not seeing or was it simply a cost cutting move?
On the older models the bottom seat bench folded up towards the front seats and the second row seatbacks folded down to become part of the cargo bed. Total distance in the cargo bed lost to the folded seats: About four inches, which maximized the open cargo area.
On my 2011 truck then second row is now one unit, so that folding them out of the way results in about twelve inches lost in the rear cargo area. Furthermore, the bed is now not one flat and contiguous space - rather, the bed drops off where the second row once was.
I am curious why GM/Chevy changed the operation of the folding second seats. Is there an advantage here that I am not seeing or was it simply a cost cutting move?