Notices
Tahoe & Suburban The power, space, and brutal towing ability make the Tahoe and its longer sibling, the Suburban, arguably the best full size SUV's on the market today.

2013 Chevrolet Suburban
Platform: GMT 400, 800, 900

GM Active Fuel Management Woes

Old February 6th, 2017, 6:04 PM
  #191  
CF Beginner
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
Default

Noob here who's shopping for a Sub or Avalanche maybe... I'd be getting a 2009 - 2011 most likely based on what I think I can afford.

Is there any way to inspect a used vehicle for "health" of the AFM system and engine in general? Thanks in advance for the help!
geoff_in_nc is offline  
Old October 1st, 2017, 1:19 PM
  #192  
CF Beginner
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1
Default

at least they offered to pay something. I have a 2007 Silverado with the 5.3ltr AFM. i replaced the motor last year with only 89,000 miles. Chevrolet denied any problems with system, they company that put in the new motor told me that the system failed let oil into the gas and ruined low end and top end. I had the long block replaced but not to sure of the fuel mgnt. system anymore and I am looking for a good way to do it. I saw a show on TV that they replaced the valves put a shim in the cam and replaced valley cover to get rid of solenoids. I just read an article on the V8 Range I am not sure i would like to find out more about it or somr otherway.
markfol is offline  
Old March 26th, 2018, 9:49 AM
  #193  
CF Beginner
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2
Default

Uh-oh.

My 2007 Suburban 1500 5.3L has the same problems.

I bought a "tune" to disable displacement on demand (DOD)/active fuel management.

But it's still consuming oil @ 75,000 miles, though not as much as before I disabled AFM.

Always have used synthetic since I got it @40,000 miles, but what else should I do in order not to have to buy a new engine?

Last edited by ncbill; March 26th, 2018 at 9:58 AM.
ncbill is offline  
Old March 19th, 2019, 3:32 PM
  #194  
CF Beginner
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1
Angry AFM killed my 2015 Suburban engine

I own a 2015 Suburban it is the fourth Suburban that I have owned since 1990. Out of the blue last Saturday as my wife was driving to an appointment, the vehicle would not go over 35 MPH.. With 106,000 miles there was no hint of an powertrain problem (performance or noise) when it was last drive two days earlier. The dealer was open on Saturday and I drove it slowly the two miles from our home after my wife had gone no further than three miles. When the engine was disassembled on Monday collapsed exhaust valve lifter was discover. Today (Tuesday) the service technician notified me that the cylinder wall had been damaged and you know the rest . . . a new engine was ordered with the bill being about $8,500!

As a GM engineer for thirty-seven years (now retired) I am very angry (pissed really) that this AFM design flaw has seemingly gone uncorrected for years. If the system is not reliable, then it should not be offered, or it should be repaired at no cost to the owner for the life of the vehicle. There goes my summer vacation plans.

My previous Suburbans all got 200,000 to 260,000 miles before they were sold. I think one is still running. I just read an item on line list the Suburban as the best vehicle in this region area to go over 100,00 miles. I would like a GM official to explain why this design has not been improved. I would also like to know how many vehicle (SUVs and trucks) with this engine have suffered this fate (lifter replacements or engine replacement.

Was ably to use my longevity with GM and customer loyalty to convince GM Customer Service to give me a $4,000 credit toward the final bill and a loaner vehicle. I am grateful for that, but I will still have a $4,000 hole in my budget. I had just spent $700 on 100,000 mile maintenance in February.
William Christen IV is offline  
Old March 20th, 2019, 6:46 AM
  #195  
CF Beginner
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 13
Default

Unreal, I had heard a few stories of this happening on newer GM products, but this is the worst case. I too cannot believe that GM doesn't recognize and deal with this. BUT, in the 1980s, I had a GMC full size blazer with a 305 that ate up its camshaft. I ended filing with an agency in the state of MN (consumer protection, better business, not sure as its been a while) and had a hearing where GM was supposed to call in and talk about the problem. They didn't and the arbitrator found in my favor - except I was too nice and didn't ask for enough for the pain in the rear in dealing with the problem.
winger_bros is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
funky_junk
Tahoe & Suburban
64
September 24th, 2016 7:55 AM
zirmar
Silverado & Fullsize Pick-ups
33
June 23rd, 2010 12:40 PM
harascho
Silverado & Fullsize Pick-ups
5
May 11th, 2009 2:10 AM
Rescue30
Tahoe & Suburban
1
May 30th, 2007 3:45 PM
Sunoco
Silverado & Fullsize Pick-ups
0
January 12th, 2006 1:35 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: GM Active Fuel Management Woes


Sponsors

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: