point understood marie but understand that up to this point nothing you have written in this thread makes any sense. I'm sure you have good intentions and have advice you think might be helpful to everyone here but the approach, man the approach is no good. Try reading what you type before posting and maybe you'll get a bettter response.

Just my 2 cents ...

~digdug

 

Now dig that is very nice of you to say to me and I will do just that before I post from now on...

 

its nothing personal,belive methere is good peolpe here you just cought some of us off guard with the post and what you were trying to get across, but ita all good.

 

Installing a K&N Air filter will not void your factory warranty, I have one on a GM vehicle that I own. However if the filter is seriously over-oiled and there is evidence of coking of burnt oil on the MAF sensor element a dealer may elect to deny a claim on the MAF.

I have heard of instances where aftermarket extended warranty companies have declined engine warranty repairs after discovering aftermarket performance air filters or elements based on the premises of “modified beyond factory specifications”, but many of these companies send out adjusters specifically to figure out new ways to screw consumers, if it weren’t for the K&N filter they’d find some other bogus reason to deny a claim.

 

So are we saying it's better to maybe stick with the "dry" filter like an Airaid or something?

 

[sm=ttiwwp.gif]( im sorry i just had to post that i thought it was funny)

 

pretty funny....
Made me chuckle![sm=exactly.gif]

 

irember that one.hahahahah. that was funny

 

AEM, Outlaw, and the GM Performance all use dry filters. The Airaid is an oiled filter!

 

i just installed the aem brute force intake in a customers tahoe today ,dam it was sweet i already took my cgs intake out and ordered me the aem one this afternoon cant wait to get it .i actually felt a difference between the two plus that dry filter is really nice