Tahoe & Suburban The power, space, and brutal towing ability make the Tahoe and its longer sibling, the Suburban, arguably the best full size SUV's on the market today.

2013 Chevrolet Suburban
Platform: GMT 400, 800, 900

Short brake life on 2013 Sub

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2015 | 8:19 AM
  #11  
SabrToothSqrl's Avatar
CF Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,900
Likes: 4
Default brakes/tires

I was able to get 60,000 out of the OEM brakes and tires on my 2009.

But I also brake very lightly... I like to coast.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2015 | 10:29 AM
  #12  
Scotiapilot's Avatar
CF Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 320
Likes: 1
Default

I am replacing mine, my habits seem to warp rotors......I have no idea what I am doing that causes this. I have studied my habits and asked my family and friends.


I have always replaced rotors with slotted and drilled.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2015 | 11:53 AM
  #13  
intheburbs's Avatar
CF Pro Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 997
Likes: 21
From: SE MI
Default

Rapid heating and cooling causes warping. Stay away from those puddles.

My Impala tended to warp rotors, but I also drove that car hard. Happened three times over 100k miles.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2015 | 2:23 PM
  #14  
05RedZ71Sub's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by intheburbs
Rapid heating and cooling causes warping. Stay away from those puddles.

My Impala tended to warp rotors, but I also drove that car hard. Happened three times over 100k miles.
I remember driving to Florida from NY on 95 in my 2001 Suburban coming down a long steep hill some traffic and a big puddle at the bottom. Rotors were done after that Bad vibration from that point on
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2015 | 12:53 AM
  #15  
Wosby's Avatar
CF Beginner
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

The rear brakes on my 2012 Suburban didn't need changing till I got to about 55k miles. I changed them a second time while doing the front brakes for the first time at 100k miles. Not sure why the rear brakes wear so much faster than the front, and the inner pads (those in contact with the piston) wear much faster on the outer pads, especially in the front.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2015 | 6:41 PM
  #16  
73shark's Avatar
Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,338
Likes: 194
From: KC, MO area
Default

You need to check the caliper slide pins and make sure they are lubricated properly. Sounds like the caliper and/or the piston is sticking.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2015 | 8:26 PM
  #17  
05RedZ71Sub's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOqTE=Wosby;298906]The rear brakes on my 2012 Suburban didn't need changing till I got to about 55k miles. I changed them a second time while doing the front brakes for the first time at 100k miles. Not sure why the rear brakes wear so much faster than the front, and the inner pads (those in contact with the piston) wear much faster on the outer pads, especially in the front.[/QUOTE]
Is that mostly highway mileage? That's pretty good. My fronts had some life left at 34k but rears were done. Either the prior owner drove really hard on the brakes or GM went with cheaper pads in 2013. I'm happy wither he Duralast,Gold,Cmax pads so far. No noise and they feel,good
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 10:33 AM
  #18  
tech2's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,175
Likes: 521
Default

the rear brakes get all the throw off from the front wheels and crud up; will not slide proper as was mentioned. the inner rotor surface is always the first side of the rotor to rust, groove and pit which wears the pads more.
people who do yearly brake service (clean and lubricate the caliper pins and brackets) do not have this problem.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2015 | 11:00 AM
  #19  
TWard's Avatar
CF Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 48
Likes: 3
Default

My OEM tires had to be replaced at 34,000 miles. My wife's Sequoia tires are half gone at 7,500 miles. Apparently new car tires are crap.
I wonder if, to reduce the cost of a new vehicle, the auto manufacturers have asked the tire industry to provide a tire that get's fewer miles? Is the new tire warranty (in terms of expected mileage) different on new vehicle tires?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2015 | 1:43 PM
  #20  
SabrToothSqrl's Avatar
CF Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,900
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by TWard
I wonder if, to reduce the cost of a new vehicle, the auto manufacturers have asked the tire industry to provide a tire that get's fewer miles? Is the new tire warranty (in terms of expected mileage) different on new vehicle tires?

OEMs do not purchase any tire warranty. So it's the same tire, but no warranty...
If your asking if they do what some makers do and have a OEM specific tire, that's the 'same' tire, but comes off a different assembly line... well anything is possible.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:57 AM.