Chevy Forums - Photo Galleries - Create an Account - Chevrolet Cars


Go Back   Chevrolet Forum - Chevy Enthusiasts Forums > Chevy Trucks, SUV's, & Crossovers > Silverado & Fullsize Pick-ups


Welcome to Chevrolet forum!
Welcome to Chevrolet forum,

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to start new topics, reply to conversations, privately message other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Chevrolet forum today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-31-2009, 04:35 PM
gianelli280 gianelli280 is offline
CF Beginner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Default Carb CFM question

Hello,
I'm currently building an engine and need a new carb for it. It is a 70's 350 with 2.02 heads and a comp cams mutha thumpr cam. Looking at high 9's : 1 compression. Has an edelbrock performer intake.
Any input is much appreciated
Register today for free or log-in if already registered to remove this ad!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2009, 04:36 PM
gianelli280 gianelli280 is offline
CF Beginner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Default

-oops, non EGR as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2009, 09:49 PM
old dog's Avatar
old dog old dog is offline
CF Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 563
Default carb

i would say 800 to 850 cfm eldebrock
__________________
william j allison
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2009, 04:57 AM
gianelli280 gianelli280 is offline
CF Beginner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Default

That much, eh? What if i were to go just over 10:1, i've been playing with that idea.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2009, 07:26 AM
mudmaniac's Avatar
mudmaniac mudmaniac is offline
Ride of the Month
May 2009
1987 Chevrolet K Blazer
My Garage
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Westminster, Md.
Posts: 836
Default

I would think a 750 would be more than enough, I am not an engine builder by any measure but I don't think the compression ratio has an effect on the flow of the heads. That would depend on the intake, valve size and port size of the heads.
__________________

MudManiac
95 Tahoe 383cu.in./350hp/425ftlbs
6" lift 16x35x16 Boggers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2009, 04:42 PM
desrtrat desrtrat is online now
CF Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Daggett CA
Posts: 44
Default

a 750 cfm carb mite work to a point..BUT it will not get you into the high 9 sec. range if you are running GM 2.02 heads. good after market heads that complement your cam profile are needed. if your ready to run it, see it someone can lend you a 750 cfm carb, a do a couple of WOT runs with a vac. gauge on a manifold vac source. if your showing 5-7 in. of vac on the gauge, then go with a 850 cfm carb..
also check your intake profile for flow. need one good flowing over 6000 rpm

good luck
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2009, 06:40 PM
mudmaniac's Avatar
mudmaniac mudmaniac is offline
Ride of the Month
May 2009
1987 Chevrolet K Blazer
My Garage
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Westminster, Md.
Posts: 836
Default

I may have misunderstood, but I don't think he said he was looking to run in the 9 second range. He was talking about compression ratio.
__________________

MudManiac
95 Tahoe 383cu.in./350hp/425ftlbs
6" lift 16x35x16 Boggers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-02-2009, 11:36 AM
gianelli280 gianelli280 is offline
CF Beginner
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Definitely not expecting any runs in the 9's, but since you brought it up... No, the 2.02's were sort of a convenience, just wanted to know what would sufficiently fuel them, i figured 750 would be plenty. Thanks for the input!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-02-2009, 07:19 PM
desrtrat desrtrat is online now
CF Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Daggett CA
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gianelli280 View Post
Definitely not expecting any runs in the 9's, but since you brought it up... No, the 2.02's were sort of a convenience, just wanted to know what would sufficiently fuel them, i figured 750 would be plenty. Thanks for the input!
my goof..

750 will be good
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.