Notices
Tahoe & Suburban The power, space, and brutal towing ability make the Tahoe and its longer sibling, the Suburban, arguably the best full size SUV's on the market today.

2013 Chevrolet Suburban
Platform: GMT 400, 800, 900

Does you 5.3 do this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old November 13th, 2018, 10:45 AM
  #1  
CF Active Member
Thread Starter
 
falconbrother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 150
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Does you 5.3 do this?

I have a 2000 Suburban 4x4 with 235000 on the ODO. The engine (5.3) was replaced with one from a junkyard and I am led to believe that it has about 60,000+- miles on it (two years ago). It burns about a half a quart of oil between oil changes. My gearing is the standard good gas mileage range. That thing is a screamer. I can't plant the gas pedal from a stop or it will just burn up the tires. I use it to tow a travel trailer that, ready to go, I figure weighs about 6,500 pounds. On flat and level highway it's just an average tow-er. Although I have never and never plan to floor the gas pedal with the trailer attached. I pull Black Mountain at 3200 RPMs between 45-50MPH without having to give it but, about half the gas pedal. The only mod to my burb is that when I bought it it had a cold air intake. I replaced the plugs and wires and serviced the transmission oil and filter, and added an additional cooler.

But, I have friends with later model 5.3s that complain that theirs is "sluggish". My buddy has an 07 GMC with the 5.3 and he says it seems to lack power. I have heard from a few people who claim that their GM 1500 whatever with the 5.3 isn't a particularly good tow vehicle. Not everyone to be sure. I do have a friend that has the same model Suburban as me that pulls a bigger travel trailer than mine and says it does well. There seems to be inconsistency in similar vehicles with the 5.3/4L60e package. Of course I would assume that any GM with the gear ratio for towing would pull great. But, I honestly don't see many of those in the 1500 4x4s.

Does your 5.3 pull strong or is it sluggish?
Old November 15th, 2018, 10:06 AM
  #2  
CF Addict
 
SabrToothSqrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Pulls fine for what it is. I know it's not a 6.2 or diesel.
Mine with 135,000 burns at least a quart or two between oil changes. When I hit 50% I have to add a quart.
Old November 15th, 2018, 10:50 AM
  #3  
CF Active Member
Thread Starter
 
falconbrother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 150
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SabrToothSqrl
Pulls fine for what it is. I know it's not a 6.2 or diesel.
Mine with 135,000 burns at least a quart or two between oil changes. When I hit 50% I have to add a quart.
I was talking to a guy that tows with the 6.2. Apparently that's not as good of a towing engine as the 6.0 was/is.
Old November 16th, 2018, 1:09 PM
  #4  
CF Junior Member
 
suburbansr4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: IL side of IL/WI border
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The term I hear a lot is "gutless" and that it is. I tow about 5700 up some rolling midwestern hills and my 5.3L screeeeaaams at about 4-5000 RPM when it downshifts. That's actually the main reason I have been in the market for a 2500. I couldn't agree more with your comments about how the 6.0 in the 2500 tows better than the 6.2. That 6.0 is a torque monster.
Old November 16th, 2018, 3:56 PM
  #5  
CF Active Member
Thread Starter
 
falconbrother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 150
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by suburbansr4me
The term I hear a lot is "gutless" and that it is. I tow about 5700 up some rolling midwestern hills and my 5.3L screeeeaaams at about 4-5000 RPM when it downshifts. That's actually the main reason I have been in the market for a 2500. I couldn't agree more with your comments about how the 6.0 in the 2500 tows better than the 6.2. That 6.0 is a torque monster.
I wonder how the older 5.7 (350) compares when it comes to towing? Just looking at the numbers the 5.3 makes more horsepower but at much higher RPMs. As I understand it the 6.2 was designed to make the Corvette fast more than for torque and towing.
Old November 16th, 2018, 9:35 PM
  #6  
Super Moderator
 
tech2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,165
Received 507 Likes on 467 Posts
Default

the axle ratio makes all the difference. I owned a 6 liter that imo towed better then a first gen Duramax...all due to the rear end.
Old November 17th, 2018, 9:43 AM
  #7  
CF Junior Member
 
suburbansr4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: IL side of IL/WI border
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tech2
the axle ratio makes all the difference. I owned a 6 liter that imo towed better then a first gen Duramax...all due to the rear end.

Good point. I'm on the 3.73 with the 4-speed trans




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 PM.