Tahoe & Suburban The power, space, and brutal towing ability make the Tahoe and its longer sibling, the Suburban, arguably the best full size SUV's on the market today.

2013 Chevrolet Suburban
Platform: GMT 400, 800, 900

What would you take first?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old December 3rd, 2006, 6:54 PM
  #1  
CF Beginner
Thread Starter
 
Biggwaukegan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default What would you take first?????

Both Siverstar Ultra (top of line) headlights and K&N Air Filter are priced at $60. My question is which would you take first? Im leanin towards the air filter because it helps gas comsumption and filtration to the Tahoe. The headlights are very nice considering the stock ones suck so please chime in......
Old December 4th, 2006, 1:09 AM
  #2  
CF Junior Member
 
1hot650r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: What would you take first?????

air filter
Old December 7th, 2006, 12:59 PM
  #3  
CF Active Member
 
uncle bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: What would you take first?????

I've dyno tested the K & N opposed to a Wix standard filter and saw 0 horsepower gain. Go for the lights.
Old December 7th, 2006, 7:31 PM
  #4  
CF Veteran
 
tahoe07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: What would you take first?????

I vote lights. popular opinion is that if there is any gain it is not where you need it. if you want a lifetime filter go ahead but power isn't a good reason to get the K&N
Old December 7th, 2006, 7:36 PM
  #5  
CF Active Member
 
Gapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: What would you take first?????

+1 ^^^^^

wait to do the filter until you can afford to throw S/C and full 3" exhaust! LOL!
Old December 7th, 2006, 8:38 PM
  #6  
CF Addict
 
ZX1100F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: What would you take first?????

ORIGINAL: uncle bill

I've dyno tested the K & N opposed to a Wix standard filter and saw 0 horsepower gain. Go for the lights.
I would certainly disagree with this.
The Wix 42487 is rated at 320CFM and the K&N is over 500CFM.
The Dyno's I've seen done show a slight improvement (>5hp) in power with the K&N 33-2129 vs. the stock AC Delco A1518C which is also rated at 320CFM.
While not a significant power gain (nothing you are going to feel in the seat of your pants) it is genuine and generally across the RPM scale.

I do not have a K&N filter in my truck, but I do use them in my motorcycles and boat.
Old December 7th, 2006, 11:19 PM
  #7  
CF Addict
 
biglg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: What would you take first?????

Dont you still chance the issue of oil on the mass air sensor?
Old December 8th, 2006, 3:02 PM
  #8  
CF Junior Member
 
ibcheeky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: What would you take first?????

There have also been a lot of experts in the auto and truck industry that claim K&N filters allow fine particulates to pass through the filter media. This has been backed up and proven through engine oil analysis. I personally don't think its worth causing premature wear to your engine for zero to marginal horsepower gains.
Old December 8th, 2006, 6:27 PM
  #9  
CF Active Member
 
LTZ_HOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: What would you take first?????

I would go with the lights. But I would pay extra and get HIDs.
Old December 8th, 2006, 7:11 PM
  #10  
CF Addict
 
ZX1100F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: What would you take first?????

I'm not a big fan of aftermarket go-fast goodies in general and would not recommend a K&N filter as an OEM replacement for the GMT900's.

I’ve heard many rumors about lots of different types of filters and quite frankly; I think that much of what is said is without a shred of data to back up.
I had an 89 Chevy K1500 that I owned till it had well over 130K miles, it had a K&N on since nearly day one. I sold the truck to a friend who later sold it to his father. Several years ago I was offered a chance to drive the truck (for old times sake), it had over 260K miles on it and the old boy told me that the engine and transmission were original and that he was still cleaning and reusing the old K&N air filter that I put in it, so they must not be all that bad.

But when compared to a flame arrestor (that most boats come equipped with) or an oiled-foam element filter found on many motorcycles the K&N is a much better choice for sure.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
luckydriver
Impala
4
May 31st, 2014 7:02 AM
tom5170
Silverado & Fullsize Pick-ups
8
March 16th, 2010 9:41 PM



Quick Reply: What would you take first?????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:24 PM.